Factory Farming: Historical Roots of Ethical Issues
- David Bell
- Jan 5
- 12 min read
Factory farming is an industrial method of raising animals for food, prioritising maximum production at minimal cost. While efficient, it has led to significant issues:
Animal Welfare: Animals are confined in cramped spaces, often mutilated, and bred for extreme productivity, causing suffering.
Environmental Impact: Factory farms produce vast amounts of waste, polluting water and air, and contribute to deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions.
Public Health Risks: Overuse of antibiotics in animals fuels antibiotic resistance, while crowded conditions increase the risk of zoonotic diseases.
Historically, factory farming emerged in the late 19th century with industrial innovations like mechanised processing and synthetic fertilisers. Post-WWII policies accelerated its growth, prioritising efficiency over welfare. Today, alternatives like organic farming, regenerative practices, and cultivated meat aim to address these challenges, alongside stricter policies and public advocacy.
The history of factory farming reveals the consequences of prioritising efficiency over ethics, urging systemic reforms across production, policy, and consumer behaviour.
How Factory Farming Developed Over Time
From Traditional Farms to Industrial Production
The shift from traditional farming methods to large-scale industrial production began in the late 19th century, spearheaded by innovations at the Chicago Union Stockyards, which opened in 1865. These stockyards introduced disassembly lines for processing livestock, an idea that later inspired Henry Ford's automotive assembly line [4].
Mechanisation brought sweeping changes to agriculture. For instance, manual threshing, which could only process 15–40 kg per hour, was replaced by machines capable of handling up to 2,000 kg per hour [4]. This leap in efficiency made large-scale farming economically feasible. Farms moved away from raising various species alongside crops to specialising in a single species or even a specific stage of production.
Another game-changer came with the introduction of synthetic nitrogen fertilisers in the early 20th century. By the 1940s and 1950s, the discovery that antibiotics could promote animal growth enabled farmers to raise animals in densely packed environments [4]. These advancements transformed the labour landscape as well. In the United States, agricultural workers made up 41% of the workforce in 1900, but that figure plummeted to just 2% by 2000 [4]. These developments laid the groundwork for the post-war intensification of farming practices.
Post-War Growth and Intensive Farming
The aftermath of World War II marked a pivotal moment in the evolution of farming. The Green Revolution, a mid-20th-century wave of agricultural innovations, created an abundance of grain that could sustain confined animals throughout the year [3]. Technological advancements in refrigeration, transportation, and automation further enabled centralised processing and the distribution of food over long distances [3].
Government policies also played a role, favouring free-market strategies that pushed small farmers to either scale up or exit the industry. Between 1950 and 1997, the average farm size in the U.S. more than doubled, growing from 215 to 487 acres, while the total number of farms dropped dramatically from 5.39 million to 1.91 million [4].
The results were staggering. By the early 2000s, modern broiler chickens grew to nearly twice the weight in less than half the time compared to chickens in the 1930s [4]. Selective breeding also increased egg production, with hens laying over 300 eggs per year by the early 2000s, compared to just 100 eggs annually in 1910 [3]. However, these advancements came with consequences. By 2009, 80% of all antibiotics sold in the U.S. were used in livestock production rather than for human medicine [4].
Global Expansion of Industrial Animal Agriculture
The industrial farming model soon spread across the globe, driven by rising demand for affordable meat, dairy, and eggs. By the early 21st century, industrial methods accounted for 75% of global poultry production and over 50% of global pork production [2]. Countries like China, Brazil, and India rapidly adopted factory farming techniques to meet growing domestic and international demand [3].
This shift also led to greater market concentration. Researchers Mary Hendrickson and Harvey S. James Jr. highlighted this trend, noting:
"Decisions about who produces our food, what food is produced, how it is produced, and who gets to eat that food have been steadily moving from … households and governments to … corporation boardrooms" [4].
In the U.S. beef industry, just four companies now control 82% of sales [4]. Vertical integration - where corporations oversee multiple stages of production, from breeding to slaughter - has become the standard, ensuring consistent supply chains and maximising efficiency [3][2]. Today, approximately 99% of animals raised for food in the United States are kept in intensive farming systems [3]. This global adoption of industrial practices has standardised production methods and introduced ethical issues, which will be explored in the following sections.
The Ethical Problems Created by Factory Farming
Animal Suffering and Welfare
The industrialisation of farming may have boosted efficiency, but it has also brought serious concerns about animal welfare. In the US, nearly all food animals are raised in intensive systems, and a large proportion in the UK face similar conditions, highlighting the sheer scale of this practice.
The living conditions for these animals are deeply troubling. Chickens, pigs, and cows are often confined indoors for their entire lives, unable to engage in natural behaviours such as wing-flapping, scratching, or nesting. Pigs are frequently kept in farrowing or gestation crates so small they cannot even turn around, while cows in some areas are tethered in tie stalls - though this practice is no longer permitted in the UK [1][3].
To manage stress and overcrowding, animals are subjected to routine mutilations such as beak trimming and tail docking, often performed without anaesthetic [1][3]. Selective breeding has compounded the suffering. For instance, broiler chickens are bred to grow so quickly that their legs often cannot support their body weight, leading to chronic pain and mobility issues [1][3]. Turkeys, bred to be unnaturally large, cannot mate naturally and require artificial insemination [3].
The inability to perform natural behaviours leaves animals bored, frustrated, and prone to harmful repetitive actions [1][3]. On top of this, there are concerns about inhumane slaughter practices, such as ineffective stunning methods for chickens and fish, which can leave animals conscious during the process [1].
Damage to the Environment
The environmental toll of factory farming is immense and extends far beyond the farms themselves. For example, a single steer produces approximately 30 kg of manure daily - adding up to nearly a tonne each year [3]. In the United States, pig farms alone generate an estimated 75,750 tonnes of waste annually, a figure comparable to the waste produced by half of the country’s human population [1].
This concentrated waste wreaks havoc on local ecosystems. Runoff from manure and urine contaminates waterways and groundwater with nitrates and faecal matter [2][3]. James M. MacDonald from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service explained:
"Excessive localised concentrations of manure can lead to environmental damage through contamination of ground and surface water and through volatilisation of nitrogen nutrients into airborne pollutants" [2].
The resource demands of factory farming are staggering. In the US, at least half of all crops - mainly maize and soy - are grown to feed livestock [3]. Producing these feed crops requires enormous amounts of fossil fuels for machinery, fertiliser production, and transportation. Meanwhile, the UK’s appetite for chicken has been identified as a major factor driving deforestation in South America [1].
This dependence on feed crops and large-scale livestock operations not only consumes vast amounts of energy but also generates significant greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change and biodiversity loss [3]. These environmental issues also pose serious risks to human communities.
Effects on Communities and Public Health
Factory farming’s impact doesn’t stop at the environment - it also poses serious risks to public health. In some countries, around 80% of medically important antibiotics are used in the animal sector, primarily to promote growth and prevent disease in healthy animals [3]. This routine use of antibiotics accelerates the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or "superbugs", which threaten the effectiveness of human medicine. By 2050, antibiotic resistance is projected to cause 10 million deaths annually [1]. The World Health Organization has warned:
"Antimicrobial resistance is a serious threat to global public health" [3].
The crowded and stressful conditions in factory farms also create ideal environments for the spread of pathogens, increasing the risk of zoonotic diseases and global pandemics [6]. The genetic uniformity of animals in these systems further accelerates the spread and evolution of viruses, making them potentially more dangerous [1].
Local communities near factory farms face additional health challenges. Air pollution, including dust and foul odours, has been linked to respiratory issues among nearby residents [3]. Manure from these operations often contaminates groundwater and surface water, endangering local drinking supplies [1].
The rise of factory farming has also reshaped rural economies. Since the 1970s, policies like U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz’s "Get big or get out" strategy have driven the replacement of family-owned farms with large corporate operations [3]. This shift has deeply affected the economic and social fabric of rural communities [5][3].
Solutions to Factory Farming's Ethical Problems
Alternative Farming Methods
Alternative farming methods offer ways to address the negative impacts of industrial agriculture. Organic farming, for instance, avoids synthetic chemicals and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), adhering to principles like health, ecology, and care [8]. In the United States, the number of certified organic farms increased by 17% between 2016 and 2019, totalling 16,500 farms [8]. Organic practices are particularly resilient, with yields up to 40% higher during drought conditions [8].
Regenerative agriculture takes a different approach, focusing on restoring damaged ecosystems and rebuilding topsoil. Farmers adopting these methods often see better returns [8]. However, critics point out that regenerative models involving livestock may still contribute to climate challenges, as animal agriculture is responsible for at least 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions [9].
Agroecology offers a broader perspective, blending scientific knowledge with Indigenous practices to enhance animal welfare, biodiversity, and social fairness [8]. This approach emphasises "food sovereignty" - giving communities control over their own food systems - rather than just ensuring food availability [8]. Groups like La Via Campesina champion this movement, advocating for farming methods that are both environmentally sound and culturally appropriate [8].
High-welfare labelling systems, such as "Free Range", "Organic", and "RSPCA Assured", also play a role in improving animal welfare. These labels indicate better living conditions, allowing animals to engage in natural behaviours and reducing the reliance on routine antibiotics [10]. Consumers can support these efforts by checking labels or buying directly from farmers' markets and local box schemes [10].
While traditional alternatives lay the groundwork for change, newer innovations like cultivated meat are reshaping the conversation.
Cultivated Meat as an Alternative
Building on these methods, cultivated meat offers a completely new way to produce food. This technology creates real meat by growing animal cells in a lab, eliminating the need to raise and slaughter animals [11][15]. As Brian Spears, CEO of New Age Meats, succinctly puts it:
"People want meat. They don't want slaughter." [11]
The environmental advantages are striking. When powered by renewable energy, cultivated meat can cut carbon emissions by up to 92% and reduce land use by 94% compared to conventional farming [16]. It also uses up to 76% less water and eliminates antibiotics from the production process, addressing public health concerns [16].
Governments are beginning to back this technology. The UK has invested £12 million in the Cellular Agriculture Research Hub (CARMA) to advance sustainable protein production, while the Netherlands has allocated €60 million to support cultivated meat development [12]. Organisations like The Cultivarian Society are raising awareness and pushing for policies to promote this ethical and environmentally friendly alternative.
In addition, precision fermentation is revolutionising food production by using microorganisms to create ingredients like milk, cheese, and meat in controlled environments [7]. This method is incredibly resource-efficient, requiring up to 1,700 times less land than soy farming and up to 157,000 times less than raising cattle or sheep [7]. For instance, 80% of the rennet used in cheesemaking today is derived through precision fermentation, replacing traditional methods that relied on enzymes from calves' stomachs [7].
Government Policy and Public Pressure
Addressing the ethical issues of factory farming also requires robust government policies and active public engagement. Governments play a crucial role in setting minimum welfare standards and banning harmful practices. Increasingly, policymakers are adopting a "systems approach", considering the entire lifecycle of animals rather than focusing on isolated aspects [13]. As Rt Hon Emma Reynolds MP, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, explains:
"Every animal will experience positive welfare throughout their life. We will use the best available science to set standards and measure outcomes." [13]
Economic incentives, such as the UK's Animal Health and Welfare Pathway, provide funding and guidance to help farmers meet higher welfare standards [13]. Trade policies also aim to protect domestic farmers from being undercut by low-welfare imports [13].
Public advocacy plays a key role in driving change. Undercover investigations exposing cruelty have pressured governments to strengthen inspections and licensing systems [14]. With 85% of UK adults recognising a responsibility to protect animal welfare [13], there is widespread public support for reform. However, enforcement remains a challenge. As Animal Equality notes:
"For laws to be effective, they must be applied and followed. Unfortunately... this is too often not the case on farms and in slaughterhouses." [14]
Current efforts include phasing out confinement systems like cages and farrowing crates, introducing mandatory licensing for farms, and enhancing transparency through better food labelling [13][14]. Advocacy groups are also working to close regulatory gaps by encouraging information sharing between agencies. Meanwhile, consumers can contribute by reducing their reliance on factory-farmed products and supporting alternatives like cultivated meat [13][14][15].
Conclusion: Building a Better Food System
What We've Learned from Factory Farming's History
The history of factory farming offers a clear message: focusing solely on efficiency at the expense of welfare has far-reaching consequences. After the Second World War, the push for large-scale production [3] turned food systems into industrial operations. This reliance on intensive farming practices has shaped the ethical dilemmas we face today [3].
One of the key takeaways from this history is the risk of over-reliance on quick technological fixes. The excessive use of antibiotics, for instance, continues to pose serious health risks [1][3]. Similarly, breeding animals for extreme productivity - like hens that now lay over 300 eggs annually compared to just 100 in 1910 [3] - has led to widespread suffering, including chronic pain and deformities. As The Humane League UK aptly points out:
"It's another example of the animal being made to fit the system, rather than the other way around" [1].
Perhaps the most important lesson is that systemic issues require systemic solutions. History has shown that piecemeal adjustments don't work. Only comprehensive reforms - ranging from changes in policy to shifts in consumer behaviour - can truly transform our food systems. These lessons from the past challenge us to rethink the entire structure of how food is produced and consumed.
Steps Towards Change
To create a better future, action is needed across all levels of society. In the UK alone, over 1.2 billion animals are slaughtered each year, with 95% of them raised on factory farms [1]. Government intervention can play a vital role, as seen in California’s Proposition 12. In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the state’s ban on selling pork and eggs from animals confined in cages and crates [3]. Policies like these, coupled with setting higher welfare standards, can initiate meaningful reforms. Industries, too, can adopt practices that prioritise animal welfare, such as using slower-growing breeds and implementing humane stunning methods [1].
On an individual level, people wield significant influence through their choices. Reducing meat consumption lowers the demand for intensive farming, while opting for cultivated meat provides an ethical alternative - real meat without the need for slaughter. Organisations like The Cultivarian Society are actively raising awareness and advocating for policies to support these alternatives, proving that technological advancements can go hand in hand with compassion. As Nicholas Carter, Director of Environmental Science at the Game Changers Institute, explains:
"Ultimately, we can grow more food on less land, and rewild the rest" [17].
Progress doesn't mean returning to outdated methods. Instead, it involves learning from the past to create a more ethical and sustainable system. By translating public support into tangible action - through policy, industry standards, and personal choices - we can pave the way for a food system that prioritises both people and the planet.
FAQs
What are the key ethical concerns surrounding factory farming?
Factory farming brings up serious ethical questions, particularly when it comes to animal welfare, environmental damage, and societal impacts. Animals in these systems are often confined in tight, unnatural spaces, causing immense suffering. On top of that, the industry plays a big role in environmental problems like deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, and water contamination.
Public health is also at risk. Factory farming creates conditions that can spread zoonotic diseases and fuels the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. It doesn't stop there - these large-scale operations often weaken rural communities by pushing out smaller, local farms. Tackling these issues means rethinking how we produce food and moving towards systems that are kinder to animals, people, and the planet.
What led to the rise of factory farming as the main method of animal agriculture?
Factory farming took root during the industrial era, when farming began to adopt the principles of mass production and new technologies. Techniques like selective breeding to maximise output, mechanised housing systems, and the widespread use of antibiotics made it possible to produce food at lower costs and on a much larger scale.
Government subsidies played a key role in accelerating this shift, treating animals less as sentient beings and more as resources to be optimised. While this system prioritised efficiency and profit, it also brought with it a host of ethical, environmental, and societal issues that remain deeply concerning today.
What are the ethical alternatives to factory farming?
There are several alternatives to factory farming that aim to tackle ethical concerns while addressing issues like animal welfare, environmental damage, and public health risks.
One promising option is cultivated meat. This method involves growing animal cells in controlled settings to create real meat - no animal slaughter required. It offers the same taste and texture as traditional meat but avoids the moral and environmental downsides of intensive farming.
Another approach is adopting higher-welfare farming systems, such as free-range or pasture-based methods. These systems allow animals to exhibit natural behaviours and minimise unnecessary suffering, striking a balance between ethical practices and sustainable food production.
Lastly, plant-based proteins and novel protein sources like mycoprotein or algae are gaining traction as nutritious, animal-free alternatives. Thanks to advancements in food technology, these options are becoming more affordable and appealing, opening the door to a kinder and more sustainable food future in the UK.
Comments