Cultivated Meat and Food Security: What Studies Show
- David Bell
- Dec 30, 2025
- 12 min read
Cultivated meat could reshape how we produce food, especially as the global population grows and resources shrink. By 2050, demand for livestock protein is expected to rise by 40%, but traditional farming methods are already straining the planet - using 83% of agricultural land and contributing up to 20% of greenhouse gas emissions. Cultivated meat, grown from animal cells in bioreactors, offers a way to produce protein with far fewer resources.
Key findings about cultivated meat include:
Resource Savings: Up to 96% less water, 99% less land, and 92% fewer emissions compared to beef when powered by renewables.
Efficiency: Converts crops into meat three times better than chicken, the most efficient conventional option.
Food Security: Can be produced in regions with limited farmland, reducing reliance on imports.
Nutrition: Similar to traditional meat but with higher mineral content and no antibiotics.
Challenges: High energy demands, scaling production, and public scepticism about safety and "unnaturalness" remain hurdles.
While cultivated meat has the potential to reduce environmental impact and improve food security, its success depends on overcoming energy and cost barriers, ensuring safety, and addressing public concerns.
Resource Efficiency Compared to Conventional Meat
Traditional livestock farming is incredibly resource-intensive. It currently takes up 83% of all global agricultural land and is responsible for between 16.5% and 19.4% of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions [5]. With growing concerns about food security, it’s essential to evaluate how cultivated meat stacks up in terms of efficiency and sustainability.
Studies reveal that cultivated meat is nearly three times more efficient at converting crops into meat compared to chicken, which is already the most efficient conventional option. This is because it bypasses the need to raise entire animals, avoiding the biological inefficiencies of traditional farming. Researcher Pelle Sinke explains:
"CM is almost three times more efficient in turning crops into meat than chicken, the most efficient animal, and therefore agricultural land use is low." [5]
When it comes to land use and emissions, cultivated meat shows a dramatic advantage. If produced using renewable energy, it could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 92% and land use by up to 90% compared to conventional beef [6]. A full shift to cellular agriculture by 2050 could slash annual greenhouse gas emissions by 52% and free up around 9.6 million km² of agricultural land for other purposes [1].
The energy source used in production plays a critical role in determining the carbon footprint. When clean energy powers the process, cultivated meat’s emissions drop significantly below those of beef and pork, and come close to matching chicken [5]. The table below highlights the key differences in resource use and environmental impact between cultivated meat and conventional options.
Resource Use: Cultivated vs. Conventional Meat
Resource / Impact | Cultivated Meat | Conventional Beef | Conventional Chicken |
Land Use | ~90% less than beef [6] | Highest; uses 83% of agricultural land [5] | Lowest among conventional meats [5] |
GHG Emissions | Up to 92% lower with renewables [6] | High; methane and nitrous oxide [5] | Comparable to cultivated meat with renewables [5] |
Crop Conversion Efficiency | 3× better than chicken [5] | Least efficient | Most efficient among conventional meats [5] |
Primary Emissions Type | Mainly CO₂ from energy use [5] | Methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) [5] | Nitrous oxide (N₂O) and CO₂ |
Nutrient Loss | Low in controlled systems [5] | High; 47% phosphorus loss [1] | Moderate |
Cultivated meat also stands out in managing nutrients and water. It avoids the nitrogen-related air pollution and water contamination caused by manure in conventional farming [5]. Furthermore, the controlled environment of cellular agriculture could cut global phosphorus demand by 53%, as it prevents the large-scale nutrient losses typical of traditional farming [1].
Scaling Production and Global Food Supply
Taking cultivated meat from the lab to the dinner table requires a shift towards industrial-scale production. The industry is moving away from small-scale tissue engineering and adopting large-scale bioprocessing using stirred tank bioreactors of 20,000 litres or more [7]. These massive bioreactors, similar to those used in pharmaceutical production, are expected to form the backbone of facilities that can meet worldwide protein demand.
The technical challenges here are no small feat. Success hinges on developing durable cell lines that thrive in large-scale bioreactors, as well as refining bioreactor designs like hollow fibre and air-lift reactors [7]. What makes this especially promising is that cultivated meat production is "landless", meaning it untethers protein production from traditional farming. This flexibility allows facilities to be set up in areas with limited agricultural resources, offering a potential lifeline to regions struggling with food insecurity [2].
Artificial intelligence and automation are playing an increasingly important role in this scaling process. Megan Frances Moss from Monash University highlights this trend, noting:
"the manufacture of CM is one vision of the future of robotics and AI in agriculture" [2]
These technologies can help optimise the intricate processes involved in growing animal cells at scale, managing everything from temperature control to nutrient delivery and cell density.
Economic projections reveal both the challenges and opportunities of scaling cultivated meat. By 2034, the industry could grow to an estimated USD 36 billion. However, achieving cost parity with traditional meat remains a hurdle under current technologies [7]. Corbin M. Goodwin from North Carolina State University points out:
"scale-up feasibility may hinge on cost-saving areas such as use of plant-based media components, food-grade aseptic conditions and extensive scaling of related supply chains" [7]
Market Forecasts and Economic Impact
The potential global benefits of scaling cultivated meat go far beyond market growth. If cellular agriculture becomes widespread by 2050, it could reduce the amount of agricultural land needed by up to 83% [1]. This shift would also lower global maize demand to 883 million tonnes by 2050, compared to 1.2 billion tonnes in 2020, as 65% of maize currently feeds livestock [1].
Energy requirements, however, present a mixed picture. While cultivated meat production is energy-intensive – a global transition would use about 33% of the projected global green energy capacity by 2050 [1] – it offers significant savings in other resources. When powered by renewable energy, it could cut phosphorus demand by 53% and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the food system by 52% annually [1]. To fully realise these environmental benefits, production facilities must integrate renewable energy sources like wind and solar.
These figures highlight the immense potential of cultivated meat to transform global food systems, setting the stage for further exploration into its nutritional and health benefits.
Nutritional and Health Benefits
Cultivated meat isn't just about efficiency and scalability; its nutritional profile plays a vital role in shaping the future of food security.
One of the main questions is whether cultivated meat can match the nutritional value of traditional meat. Research indicates that while the metabolic profiles are quite similar, there are some key differences. For example, studies on cultivated chicken meat (CCM) highlight higher levels of essential minerals like copper, iron, potassium, and zinc [8]. Piotr Rzymski, the lead researcher of a detailed nutritional analysis, commented:
"The CCM analyzed in the present study revealed similarities to the nutritional profile of conventional chicken breast meat, with superior mineral content, particularly regarding Cu, Fe, K, and Zn." [8]
However, cultivated meat does have some nutritional gaps. Protein content in CCM is lower - 9% less in serum-free versions and 16% less in serum-based ones. It also contains reduced amounts of essential amino acids such as histidine, isoleucine, and leucine [8]. On the vitamin front, CCM offers higher levels of vitamins B5, B6, and A, but falls short on vitamin B3. Additionally, it has increased saturated fat and cholesterol levels [8].
The health benefits of cultivated meat go beyond just nutrition. Its production takes place in sterile or aseptic conditions, eliminating contamination risks from pathogens like Salmonella and E. coli - issues that frequently affect conventional meat supply chains [9]. The Food Standards Agency (FSA) highlights this advantage:
"Culturing occurs under sterile/aseptic conditions to prevent contamination of the culture." [9]
Another major benefit is that cultivated meat can be produced without the use of antibiotics [9]. This stands in stark contrast to traditional livestock farming, where antibiotics are often used preventatively due to overcrowding. Public sentiment reflects these advantages: 71% of people are more likely to choose cultivated meat if it reduces the risk of food-borne illnesses [4]. Additionally, consumers place high importance on "produced without antibiotics" as a label claim [4]. Together, these nutritional and safety benefits highlight how cultivated meat could contribute to a more secure and reliable food system.
Food Safety Research Initiatives
Ensuring the nutritional and safety benefits of cultivated meat hinges on maintaining high food safety standards. In October 2024, the FSA secured £1.6 million from the Government's Engineering Biology Sandbox Fund to develop a safety programme for cultivated meat [4]. This initiative, scheduled to start in March 2025, aims to conduct rigorous safety assessments before any cell-cultivated products are approved for sale in the UK [4].
The programme will focus on critical areas such as the stability of cell lines, the composition of serum-free growth media, and the safety of scaffold materials used in production [3][10]. Such research is essential to address consumer concerns, especially since 85% of UK consumers have expressed worries about the safety of cultivated meat [4]. By tackling these issues head-on, the initiative aims to build trust and confidence in this emerging food technology.
Regional Applications for Food Security
Around the world, different regions are approaching cultivated meat with strategies tailored to their unique food security challenges and regulatory landscapes.
Singapore stands out as a trailblazer in this field. Back in 2020, it became the first country to approve cultivated meat for consumption. This achievement came after a collaboration between Eat Just, a cultivated meat producer, and the Singapore Food Agency to ensure compliance with novel food safety standards [11][12]. For Singapore, where land is scarce and most food is imported, this development is a game-changer. By producing meat in bioreactors instead of relying on traditional livestock farming, the country sidesteps the resource limitations tied to rearing animals [11]. An American startup has already met Singapore's food safety standards, supplying lab-grown chicken to the market. While Singapore leads with swift regulatory acceptance, other regions are taking more cautious or varied approaches.
The United Kingdom is adopting a more gradual strategy, focusing on bolstering food sovereignty through local cultivated meat production. The UK is developing robust safety assessment protocols within a sandbox-style regulatory framework [4]. With 55% of its pig meat and 30% of its beef, veal, sheep, and lamb currently imported [12], producing meat locally could significantly enhance the nation's food security. However, public opinion is mixed - 59% of UK consumers see the potential benefits for global food availability, yet 85% express concerns about safety and the impact on traditional farming [4].
In the European Union, progress is inconsistent, with regulatory frameworks varying widely across member states. Some countries are exploring pathways for approval, while others have implemented outright bans [11][13][14].
Reducing Import Dependence Through Local Production
Localised production plays a key role in reshaping supply chains and boosting food sovereignty. By producing cultivated meat closer to urban centres, regions can reduce their dependence on imports and minimise vulnerabilities tied to global supply chains. Unlike traditional livestock farming, cultivated meat requires far less arable land and water - up to 95% less land and 78% less water compared to conventional beef production [12]. This urban production model also slashes the need for long-distance transport, further strengthening regional food systems [12][14]. Such innovations could transform global protein supply chains and reduce the risks associated with heavy reliance on imports.
Research Findings and Future Directions
Studies reveal that cultivated meat has the potential to significantly reduce environmental impacts. Compared to traditional farming, it could lower greenhouse gas emissions by 52%, cut phosphorus demand by 53%, and shrink land use by 83%. In some scenarios, land use could drop by as much as 99%, with water savings ranging from 82% to 96% - a critical advantage for regions where resources are limited [1][3]. However, achieving these outcomes hinges on overcoming considerable technical and energy-related obstacles.
One of the biggest challenges lies in the energy demands of production. Cultivated meat production is highly energy-intensive, requiring an estimated 33% of the global green energy capacity projected for 2050. This highlights the need to integrate renewable energy sources into the entire production process [1]. Without this shift, the environmental benefits of cultivated meat could be undermined by its energy footprint.
Beyond energy concerns, there are pressing technical and regulatory gaps to address. While early research has shown promise, scaling up production from laboratory settings to industrial bioreactors (≥20,000 litres) remains a significant hurdle. Advances in serum-free media and the use of plant-based ingredients are essential to bringing down costs and making production more viable [7][5]. Additionally, material constraints, such as the limited supply of tellurium - a key element in green energy technologies - could limit the global replacement of livestock to around 60% [1].
Social and regulatory issues add another layer of complexity. Critics argue that the high-tech and capital-heavy nature of cultivated meat production could centralise power among multinational corporations, potentially sidelining small-scale farmers in less developed regions [2]. Megan Frances Moss from Monash University cautions:
"Cultured meat is increasingly promoted as a silver bullet for the environmental challenges of traditional animal agriculture. However, these technologies threaten the pursuit of food sovereignty" [2].
Public concerns around the safety and "unnatural" nature of cultivated meat also persist. Transparent regulatory measures will be vital in addressing these apprehensions [4]. Moving forward, research must tackle these social and technical challenges in tandem. Ensuring fair access to the technology and fostering public trust through clear and open regulations will be crucial for the widespread adoption of cultivated meat.
Conclusion
Research shows that cultivated meat has the potential to break the link between protein production and land use, drastically cutting down its environmental footprint. As global demand for livestock proteins is predicted to jump by 40% by 2050 [1], and with 733 million people currently undernourished worldwide [15], these efficiencies aren't just helpful - they're absolutely necessary.
That said, the road ahead is not without challenges. Energy demands for production remain high, and material constraints could limit the replacement of traditional livestock to about 60% [1]. Social concerns also loom large, with critics warning about potential corporate monopolies and threats to food sovereignty [2]. Consumer scepticism is another hurdle, as surveys reveal that up to 85% of people are uneasy about the safety and perceived "unnaturalness" of cultivated meat [4].
For cultivated meat to succeed, collaboration between industry leaders, regulators, and the public is essential. In the UK, where consumer hesitation ranges from 16% to 41% [4], education campaigns and clear, transparent regulations will be crucial. Initiatives like The Cultivarian Society are already working to foster open discussions and empower consumers with knowledge, paving the way for cultivated meat to tackle the ethical, environmental, and societal issues tied to industrial farming.
The numbers speak for themselves: a full shift to cultivated meat could free up around 9.6 million km² of farmland and cut greenhouse gas emissions by an estimated 132 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent by 2050 [1]. Whether or not this vision becomes reality depends on our collective commitment to addressing these challenges and unlocking its potential.
FAQs
Is cultivated meat as nutritious as traditional meat?
Cultivated meat aims to replicate the nutritional profile of traditional meat, providing comparable amounts of protein, fats, and essential micronutrients. This makes it a viable alternative for maintaining a balanced diet.
What’s more, the production process of cultivated meat offers flexibility. It can be adjusted to modify fat content or even include extra nutrients, presenting a forward-thinking option for shaping the food systems of tomorrow.
What are the key challenges in scaling up cultivated meat production?
Scaling up the production of cultivated meat comes with its fair share of challenges, both technical and economic. One of the biggest obstacles is the high cost of growth media, particularly components derived from serum. These are a major reason why cultivated meat is still far more expensive than traditional meat. To tackle this, researchers are developing more affordable alternatives, such as plant-based, food-grade options, and exploring serum-free processes to bring costs down.
Another significant issue lies in the infrastructure for large-scale production. For example, bioreactors capable of handling industrial-scale volumes remain in the early stages of development, which limits the ability to produce cultivated meat on a mass scale.
There are also concerns about the materials and resources required. Scaling up cellular agriculture could lead to a spike in demand for certain raw materials, such as rare metals used in bioreactor manufacturing, potentially straining global supply chains. On top of that, ensuring a reliable supply of low-carbon energy is vital to preserve the environmental advantages of cultivated meat.
Finally, there are regulatory and quality control challenges. Navigating labelling requirements, meeting regulatory standards, and maintaining consistent product quality at scale add layers of complexity to the process. Overcoming these hurdles will demand ongoing innovation and close collaboration across the industry.
Can cultivated meat strengthen food security in areas with limited agricultural land?
Cultivated meat holds great promise for improving food security, especially in areas where farmland is limited. Research indicates that producing meat through cellular agriculture can use up to 83% less land than traditional livestock farming.
This reduced reliance on extensive agricultural land makes cultivated meat an efficient way to produce high-quality protein. It could be a game-changer for nations grappling with land shortages or challenges in maintaining food independence. Additionally, its resource efficiency aligns with global efforts to create a more resilient and fair food system.
Comments