7 Ways Cultivated Meat Reduces Carbon Emissions

Cultivated meat can cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 96% compared to conventional farming. It eliminates methane, reduces land and water use, and works seamlessly with renewable energy. Here's how it helps:

• Cuts Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Produces up to 92% fewer emissions when powered by renewables.
• Eliminates Methane: Avoids methane from livestock digestion and manure.
• Reduces Land Use and Deforestation: Uses up to 99% less land, helping prevent deforestation.
• Uses Less Energy and Water: Cuts water use by up to 96% and energy use by up to 45%.
• Shortens Supply Chains: Localised production reduces transport emissions.
• Eliminates Fertiliser and Manure Emissions: No need for fertilisers or manure, cutting nitrous oxide and methane.
• Works with Renewable Energy: Production powered by renewables can lower emissions even further.

Quick Comparison:

Cultivated meat offers a practical way to enjoy meat while addressing the climate crisis. The UK is investing in this innovation to meet its Net Zero goals by 2050.

1. Cuts Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Livestock farming is responsible for nearly 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions [5]. To put that into perspective, producing just one kilogram of beef generates emissions roughly equal to 100 kilograms of carbon dioxide [5]. That’s a staggering impact for a single food item.

Cultivated meat offers a radically different solution. By growing meat directly from animal cells in a lab, it bypasses the need for raising, feeding, and processing entire animals. This streamlined process is where the major environmental savings come into play.

Studies show that cultivated meat can slash emissions by 78–96%. If renewable energy powers the process, cultivated beef could reduce emissions by up to 92% [3][4]. A detailed life cycle assessment looking at large-scale production facilities projected for 2030 highlights the potential. It found that using renewable energy, cultivated beef could cut its carbon footprint by 92%, pork by 44%, and still compete effectively with chicken [2]. Even when compared to optimised future scenarios for traditional meat production, cultivated meat holds a clear edge.

One of the key reasons for these reductions is efficiency. Cultivated meat is nearly three times more efficient than chicken production and significantly outpaces other conventional meats [1]. The secret lies in its targeted approach: instead of using vast resources to raise entire animals, cultivated meat focuses on growing only the tissues needed for consumption. This eliminates the inefficiencies of traditional livestock farming, where animals convert only a small portion of their feed into edible meat and produce emissions throughout their lives.

The benefits don’t stop at carbon dioxide reductions. Cultivated meat production could cut air pollution by up to 94% compared to beef, 42% compared to pork, and 20% compared to chicken [2]. These numbers highlight its potential as a crucial tool in Britain’s efforts to tackle climate challenges.

2. Eliminates Methane Output

Methane is one of the most powerful greenhouse gases, and livestock farming is a major contributor. Over the first 20 years after entering the atmosphere, methane has more than 80 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide [9]. Around 30% of today's global warming is linked to methane emissions caused by human activities [9].

Cattle are a significant part of the problem. Cows release methane through a process called enteric fermentation, which happens during digestion. Methane from cows accounts for 37% of all human-caused methane emissions [3]. In 2021 alone, ruminants were responsible for producing 109 million metric tonnes of methane [12].

The issue doesn’t stop there. Stored manure from livestock farms also contributes heavily to methane emissions. In the United States, methane from cattle digestion and manure storage together makes up about 45% of agricultural emissions [11]. This creates a twofold issue: emissions from both the animals themselves and the waste they produce.

Cultivated meat offers a way to eliminate methane emissions entirely. By growing meat directly from animal cells in controlled lab environments, there’s no need for cows to digest food or for manure to decompose. Instead of methane, the production process primarily emits carbon dioxide, which comes from energy use [7]. Unlike traditional livestock farming, which releases methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide, this shift significantly reduces the industry's climate footprint.

This transition from methane-heavy emissions to primarily carbon dioxide is a game-changer for climate action. Because methane has a short atmospheric lifespan but a strong warming effect, cutting methane emissions can lead to a faster slowdown of global warming [10] [11].

Companies like Aleph Farms, SuperMeat, and Mosa Meat are already proving this methane-free approach works. Using advanced bioreactor systems to grow meat from muscle and fat stem cells, they’ve entirely removed the need for the digestive processes that produce methane [3].

The environmental benefits are clear. Even if cultivated meat production relies on fossil fuels, it can still have a smaller carbon footprint than conventional beef [8]. And when renewable energy powers production, the advantages become even more striking. This provides a promising path for reducing the warming impact of meat production on a large scale.

3. Reduces Land Use and Deforestation

Cultivated meat stands out when it comes to saving land. Traditional livestock farming demands huge amounts of space - not just for animals but also for growing their feed. In contrast, cultivated meat can slash land use by up to 99% compared to conventional beef production [14]. This massive reduction opens the door to tackling deforestation and even restoring natural ecosystems.

To put it into perspective, producing one kilogram of cultivated meat requires just 0.5–5.5m² of land, whereas beef needs a staggering 63–365m². Even chicken and pork, which are considered less resource-intensive than beef, use far more land than cultivated alternatives [15]. Globally, animal farming takes up about one-third of the Earth's total land area [15].

Beef production, in particular, is a major driver of deforestation. It accounts for 41% of global deforestation, with the Amazon region especially impacted - 80% of deforestation there is tied directly to beef farming [16]. Overall, more than 33% of habitable land is already used for animal agriculture, and an area the size of Switzerland is cleared annually for this purpose [16]. This process also contributes to a staggering 80% of global biodiversity loss and deforestation [15].

The potential to repurpose land is one of cultivated meat’s most exciting opportunities. Research suggests that transitioning land away from animal agriculture towards reforestation or carbon sequestration could remove 26 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent annually [13]. If alternative proteins, including cultivated meat, were widely adopted, it could free up land equivalent to twice the size of China and India combined. Even modest changes - like reducing ruminant meat consumption by just 20% per person by 2050 - could prevent future pasture expansion, cut annual deforestation in half, and significantly lower carbon emissions.

Companies like Mosa Meat and Aleph Farms are already leading the way by using compact bioreactor systems in their production facilities. These systems eliminate the need for sprawling pastures and vast feed crop areas, proving that cultivated meat production can be highly land-efficient [3].

The benefits don’t stop at saving space. As Elliot Swartz, Senior Scientist at GFI, explains:

4. Uses Less Energy and Water

Cultivated meat stands out for its efficiency in using resources like energy and water. Compared to traditional livestock farming, its production process requires far fewer resources, which directly contributes to lower carbon emissions.

Energy use in cultivated meat production is notably lower, ranging from 7% to 45% less than conventional meat production [3]. This is largely because it skips many of the resource-intensive steps involved in raising and processing livestock.

Water savings are even more striking, with cultivated meat cutting water use by 82% to 96%, depending on the type of product [17]. Considering that agriculture accounts for a staggering 92% of global water consumption [17], this is a huge relief for water-stressed regions. Traditional livestock farming guzzles water - not just for the animals themselves but also for growing feed crops, cleaning facilities, and processing meat. In contrast, cultivated meat facilities focus water use on cell culture, cleaning systems, and cooling equipment. Plus, advanced systems for recycling, reuse, and purification help maximise water efficiency [18].

The environmental benefits don’t stop there. Switching from conventional beef to cultivated meat produced with renewable energy can cut water use by 84% and slash carbon emissions by up to 98% [19]. For pork, carbon emissions drop by 80%, while chicken sees a 75% reduction [19].

One of the main sources of emissions in cultivated meat production is the energy used at manufacturing facilities. However, by tapping into renewable energy, producers can shrink their carbon footprint by as much as 70% [1]. This ability to integrate clean energy gives cultivated meat a clear edge over conventional farming, which relies heavily on resource-intensive methods.

5. Shortens Supply Chain Emissions

Cultivated meat doesn't just rethink how meat is produced - it also reshapes the supply chain to cut down emissions. By adopting a localised manufacturing model, it eliminates many of the steps that make traditional meat supply chains so emission-heavy. In conventional systems, feed is transported to farms, livestock are moved to processing plants, and the final products are distributed to retailers. Each of these stages involves refrigerated transport, adding up to a carbon footprint of 22kg CO₂ equivalent per kilogram of live weight [20]. Cultivated meat skips these stages, reducing both energy use and emissions significantly.

One of the key advantages of lab-grown meat is its ability to be produced closer to where it's consumed. This reduces the need for long-distance transportation, which is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions [20]. Companies like DP World are leveraging their logistics networks to help cultivated meat producers set up facilities near major logistic hubs, such as ports. This strategic placement ensures production happens closer to consumption hubs, cutting down on transport and storage emissions even further [20].

In the UK, a significant portion of meat is imported - 55% of the pig supply and 30% of beef, veal, sheep, and lamb come from overseas [21]. By producing cultivated meat locally, the emissions associated with importing meat can be eliminated entirely [21].

Beyond environmental benefits, localised production also brings economic advantages. For every £1 spent, an estimated £2.70 is generated in economic value [21]. This streamlined supply chain isn't just about cutting emissions - it's about reimagining the meat sector to be more efficient and sustainable.

6. Eliminates Fertiliser and Manure Emissions

Traditional meat production creates a twofold environmental problem. It relies heavily on fertilisers for animal feed crops and generates vast amounts of manure - both significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient pollution. On the other hand, cultivated meat bypasses these issues entirely by growing animal cells in controlled settings, removing the need for fertilisers and avoiding manure production altogether.

Agriculture is responsible for at least 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Nearly half of this (49%) comes from agricultural soil management, largely due to nitrous oxide emissions from fertilisers. Meanwhile, manure management adds another 11% through methane released during decomposition [22].

Fertiliser use alone contributes around 720 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent each year, making up 6% of the food sector's greenhouse gas emissions [23]. Nitrous oxide, which is roughly 300 times more potent than CO₂ in terms of warming potential, significantly amplifies this impact [24].

Cultivated meat production takes a completely different approach. Instead of raising animals, it uses sugars and proteins to grow cells, requiring far fewer resources than conventional methods [15]. This shift not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions but also slashes nutrient pollution. For instance, one study estimates that cultivated meat could produce just 4 to 14 grams of PO₄ equivalent nutrient pollution per kilogram, compared to the 20 to 600 grams generated by traditional meat [15]. Given that agriculture accounts for about 90% of global nutrient pollution, this reduction could make a meaningful difference.

Manure emissions present another major issue. Livestock production generates approximately 885 billion pounds (around 402 million tonnes) of manure annually - 50% more than all municipal solid waste combined [19]. This massive volume contributes significantly to methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Cultivated meat eliminates this waste entirely, showcasing its potential as a game-changer for a more sustainable food system.

7. Works with Renewable Energy

Cultivated meat production doesn’t just reduce emissions and resource use - it also aligns perfectly with renewable energy systems, offering a cleaner, more sustainable way to produce food.

Unlike traditional livestock farming, which continuously emits methane, cultivated meat can operate with near-zero emissions when powered by renewable energy. In fact, studies reveal that using clean energy in production can cut the carbon footprint of cultivated meat by an impressive 80% [25]. By eliminating reliance on fossil fuels and embracing renewable power, the environmental impact of production drops significantly.

A study by CE Delft highlights some striking figures: cultivated meat powered by renewable energy could lower global warming impacts by 17% compared to chicken, 52% compared to pork, and an astonishing 85–92% compared to beef [25]. These numbers even account for anticipated advancements in conventional farming by 2030, such as increased adoption of renewable energy in farming operations.

Air pollution also sees a dramatic decline. Cultivated meat produced with renewable energy can reduce pollution by up to 94% compared to beef, 42% compared to pork, and 20% compared to chicken [2]. This improvement is largely due to more efficient production methods and shorter supply chains, which eliminate many of the inefficiencies tied to traditional farming.

Another advantage? Cultivated meat facilities can be strategically located near renewable energy sources or equipped with on-site energy generation systems. This localisation can reduce carbon footprints by roughly 70% through targeted measures [1].

Bruce Friedrich, Executive Director of the Good Food Institute (GFI), underscores this potential:

As renewable energy becomes cheaper and more accessible, cultivated meat facilities can seamlessly integrate with these systems. This compatibility not only supports global decarbonisation goals but also positions cultivated meat as a scalable, sustainable solution for the future of food.

Emission Reduction Comparison

When it comes to environmental metrics, cultivated meat shows notable differences compared to conventional meat production. Studies have highlighted these contrasts, particularly in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and water consumption.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions present one of the clearest distinctions. Conventional beef production is responsible for emissions of about 100 kilograms of carbon dioxide per kilogram of beef [5]. By contrast, a 2023 analysis predicts that by 2030, cultivated meat could emit between 3 and 14 kilograms of carbon dioxide per kilogram, while optimised beef systems in western Europe are expected to emit around 35 kilograms [5]. The carbon footprint of cultivated meat depends heavily on production methods, with some studies indicating an 80% reduction in emissions compared to conventional beef, while others suggest it could be up to 26% higher. Generally, using food-grade ingredients tends to yield better environmental outcomes [6].

Methane Emissions, a major contributor to climate change, are another area where cultivated meat stands out. Livestock-related methane accounts for roughly 37% of all human-induced methane emissions, with methane having 23 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide [3]. Cultivated meat eliminates these methane emissions entirely, as it doesn't rely on livestock. The remaining emissions are primarily tied to energy consumption [7].

When renewable energy powers production, cultivated meat could slash the environmental impacts of conventional beef by approximately 93%, pork by 53%, and chicken by 29% [8]. However, without decarbonised energy, these advantages may be significantly reduced.

In terms of land use, cultivated meat requires 64% to 90% less land than conventional systems. This is largely due to the absence of grazing land, feed crop production, and related infrastructure [1].

Overall, cultivated meat has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 78% to 96% compared to traditional European meat production [5]. More recent studies support these figures, with some indicating reductions of up to 92% in global warming impacts relative to conventional beef [8].

Experts provide differing perspectives on these findings. Edward Spang, Associate Professor in the Department of Food Science and Technology at UC Davis, offers a cautious view:

On the other hand, Ingrid Odegard, Senior Researcher at CE Delft, sees great potential:

These comparisons highlight the significant environmental benefits that cultivated meat could offer, especially when produced using renewable energy sources.

Conclusion

Cultivated meat offers a promising solution to reduce carbon emissions through several impactful mechanisms. By significantly cutting greenhouse gas emissions - especially when paired with renewable energy - and eliminating methane emissions, it tackles key environmental challenges tied to conventional livestock farming. Its efficient use of land, energy, and water complements renewable energy systems, creating a more sustainable model for food production.

These environmental advantages are paving the way for government support and market acceptance in the UK. Recent investments, including £75 million towards sustainable food development and £1.6 million in the FSA's Cell-Cultivated Products Regulatory Sandbox, are helping to build essential infrastructure for this sector. The UK's milestone as the first European country to approve cultivated meat for pet food [27][29] demonstrates its leadership in adopting innovative approaches to combat climate change.

The stakes are high. Traditional livestock farming remains a major source of emissions, and with global meat consumption expected to double by 2050 [26], cultivated meat emerges as a crucial alternative. Encouragingly, a third of UK consumers are already open to trying cultivated meat, highlighting a growing readiness for this shift [21].

However, reducing emissions alone isn't enough - engaging society is essential to drive this transformation. Initiatives like The Cultivarian Society play a key role by raising public awareness, advocating for supportive policies, and fostering community engagement. As the global food system accounts for up to one-third of greenhouse gas emissions [30], collective action is vital to influence consumer habits, push for policy changes, and address cultural resistance to dietary evolution.

To truly revolutionise the food system, producers, retailers, restaurants, and consumers must work together to deliver real meat without the environmental burden of traditional agriculture. Supporting the growth of cultivated meat and the organisations championing this innovation can help create a sustainable food future - where we enjoy the benefits of meat without compromising the planet.

FAQs

How does cultivated meat compare to plant-based alternatives in terms of environmental impact?

Cultivated meat and plant-based alternatives both represent more sustainable options when compared to traditional livestock farming, though their environmental impacts vary. Cultivated meat has the potential to slash greenhouse gas emissions by up to 96%, use 99% less land, and require far less water than conventional meat. That said, its current production methods can be energy-heavy, which means its carbon footprint can sometimes come close to that of retail beef.

On the other hand, plant-based alternatives generally have a smaller environmental impact overall. They can cut water use by as much as 99% and have an environmental footprint that's about 50% smaller than traditional meat. Both options offer promising pathways towards more sustainable food systems, but the future benefits of cultivated meat will depend heavily on improving its scalability and energy efficiency.

What challenges are slowing down the adoption of cultivated meat?

The path to making cultivated meat a mainstream choice isn’t without its hurdles. A major sticking point is the cost of production. While prices have dropped dramatically since the technology first emerged, cultivated meat still costs more than traditional options, which limits its appeal to budget-conscious consumers.

Another significant issue is scaling up production. Producing cultivated meat in large quantities while ensuring consistent quality is no small feat. Current bioreactor technology needs further development to meet these demands efficiently. On top of that, regulatory processes in regions like the UK are still catching up, which can slow down how quickly these products reach the market.

And then there’s consumer perception. For cultivated meat to gain widespread acceptance, people need to trust its taste, texture, and overall quality. Overcoming these obstacles is key to positioning cultivated meat as a viable, sustainable alternative to conventional meat.

How does the price of cultivated meat compare to traditional meat, and what does this mean for consumers in the UK?

As of 2025, the price of cultivated meat has seen a noticeable drop due to improvements in production, including AI-driven techniques and the use of animal-free growth media. For instance, cultivated chicken is now priced at around £10.93 per kilogram, while cultivated burger patties cost less than £8 each. On the other hand, traditional meat prices, such as beef, have climbed to an average of £6.98 per kilogram, marking a 25% rise since January 2025.

For shoppers, this shift means cultivated meat is edging closer to being a viable alternative to conventional options. With prices gradually narrowing the gap, cultivated meat could present a more ethical and sustainable choice. That said, it’s still slightly pricier than traditional meat, and this cost difference, along with broader acceptance, remains a hurdle that could slow its uptake in the near future.

Related posts

• How to Explain Lab-Grown Meat to Skeptical Friends
• Is Cultivated Meat Safe? Common Questions Answered
• Food Waste Problem: How Lab Meat Offers Solutions
• Cultivated Meat and Food Justice: A New Path